<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OTA Endorsement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theopenhouseproject.com/2007/06/04/ota-endorsement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theopenhouseproject.com/2007/06/04/ota-endorsement/</link>
	<description>Recommendations, Resources, and Reform</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 00:18:16 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: OTA Update &#124; The Open House Project</title>
		<link>http://www.theopenhouseproject.com/2007/06/04/ota-endorsement/comment-page-1/#comment-3795</link>
		<dc:creator>OTA Update &#124; The Open House Project</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 19:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theopenhouseproject.com/2007/06/04/ota-endorsement/#comment-3795</guid>
		<description>[...] As we&#8217;re looking through the reforms of the last year, I realized that the Office of Technology Assessment provision was recently passed in the consolidated omnibus appropriations bill. We pushed for the OTA&#8217;s reinstatement, and previously wrote about its impending passage. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As we&#8217;re looking through the reforms of the last year, I realized that the Office of Technology Assessment provision was recently passed in the consolidated omnibus appropriations bill. We pushed for the OTA&#8217;s reinstatement, and previously wrote about its impending passage. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OTA comment, US CTO &#124; The Open House Project</title>
		<link>http://www.theopenhouseproject.com/2007/06/04/ota-endorsement/comment-page-1/#comment-3030</link>
		<dc:creator>OTA comment, US CTO &#124; The Open House Project</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 19:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theopenhouseproject.com/2007/06/04/ota-endorsement/#comment-3030</guid>
		<description>[...] From a response I just wrote to a comment on a Lessig blog post about dreaming up a US CTO position: The OTA was recently reinstated, although in a different form, when Congress passed (and President Bush signed) the most recent legislative branch appropriations bill. I work for the Sunlight Foundation, and we helped push for this measure to be adopted. (see http://www.theopenhouseproject.com/2007/06/04/ota-endorsement/ or http://www.theopenhouseproject.com/2007/06/07/ota-renewed-gets-25-million/ ) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] From a response I just wrote to a comment on a Lessig blog post about dreaming up a US CTO position: The OTA was recently reinstated, although in a different form, when Congress passed (and President Bush signed) the most recent legislative branch appropriations bill. I work for the Sunlight Foundation, and we helped push for this measure to be adopted. (see <a href="http://www.theopenhouseproject.com/2007/06/04/ota-endorsement/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theopenhouseproject.com/2007/06/04/ota-endorsement/</a> or <a href="http://www.theopenhouseproject.com/2007/06/07/ota-renewed-gets-25-million/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theopenhouseproject.com/2007/06/07/ota-renewed-gets-25-million/</a> ) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Senate Legislative Branch Appropriations Review &#124; The Open House Project</title>
		<link>http://www.theopenhouseproject.com/2007/06/04/ota-endorsement/comment-page-1/#comment-328</link>
		<dc:creator>Senate Legislative Branch Appropriations Review &#124; The Open House Project</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theopenhouseproject.com/2007/06/04/ota-endorsement/#comment-328</guid>
		<description>[...] The report goes into further detail about their plans for a revisited OTA (which was disbanded in the Gingrich revolution. Background about the Open House Project and the OTA is available here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The report goes into further detail about their plans for a revisited OTA (which was disbanded in the Gingrich revolution. Background about the Open House Project and the OTA is available here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
