<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: House Leg Branch Appropriations Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theopenhouseproject.com/2007/06/27/house-leg-branch-appropriations-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theopenhouseproject.com/2007/06/27/house-leg-branch-appropriations-review/</link>
	<description>Recommendations, Resources, and Reform</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:53:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Senate Legislative Branch Appropriations Review &#124; The Open House Project</title>
		<link>http://www.theopenhouseproject.com/2007/06/27/house-leg-branch-appropriations-review/comment-page-1/#comment-327</link>
		<dc:creator>Senate Legislative Branch Appropriations Review &#124; The Open House Project</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theopenhouseproject.com/2007/06/27/house-leg-branch-appropriations-review/#comment-327</guid>
		<description>[...] While the majority side of the Senate Appropriations committee did include a brief review of their bill (as did their House counterpart), I&#8217;d like to give my impressions of the appropriations from the perspective of an advocate for public access and transparency, using the Senate report as a guide. (The Republican websites don&#8217;t feature any press releases, which isn&#8217;t surprising, given the minority&#8217;s smaller staff and budget, comparative lack of clout in controlling committee functioning, and their opportunity to add dissenting views to the report, as I discovered in reading the House report.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] While the majority side of the Senate Appropriations committee did include a brief review of their bill (as did their House counterpart), I&#8217;d like to give my impressions of the appropriations from the perspective of an advocate for public access and transparency, using the Senate report as a guide. (The Republican websites don&#8217;t feature any press releases, which isn&#8217;t surprising, given the minority&#8217;s smaller staff and budget, comparative lack of clout in controlling committee functioning, and their opportunity to add dissenting views to the report, as I discovered in reading the House report.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

