<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Defense of Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theopenhouseproject.com/2007/07/31/in-defense-of-politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theopenhouseproject.com/2007/07/31/in-defense-of-politics/</link>
	<description>Recommendations, Resources, and Reform</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 02:48:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: papicek</title>
		<link>http://www.theopenhouseproject.com/2007/07/31/in-defense-of-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>papicek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 04:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theopenhouseproject.com/2007/07/31/in-defense-of-politics/#comment-118</guid>
		<description>Sounds more like a defense of adversarial systems.  For what it&#039;s worth, there are alternatives:  German courts operate under an assumption of discovering the truth, with slightly different procedures than ours (not that I&#039;m an expert, but i&#039;ve looked into it).  The trouble with with adversarial systems in governance, as we&#039;ve seen, is that often the most (not even the best) rhetoric wins.  Often that&#039;s a case of who has the deeper pockets and the better organization.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds more like a defense of adversarial systems.  For what it&#8217;s worth, there are alternatives:  German courts operate under an assumption of discovering the truth, with slightly different procedures than ours (not that I&#8217;m an expert, but i&#8217;ve looked into it).  The trouble with with adversarial systems in governance, as we&#8217;ve seen, is that often the most (not even the best) rhetoric wins.  Often that&#8217;s a case of who has the deeper pockets and the better organization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
