<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NARA Looking for Public Input</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theopenhouseproject.com/2007/09/10/nara-looking-for-public-input/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theopenhouseproject.com/2007/09/10/nara-looking-for-public-input/</link>
	<description>Recommendations, Resources, and Reform</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:53:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: House Appropriations Testimony &#124; The Open House Project</title>
		<link>http://www.theopenhouseproject.com/2007/09/10/nara-looking-for-public-input/comment-page-1/#comment-6088</link>
		<dc:creator>House Appropriations Testimony &#124; The Open House Project</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 23:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theopenhouseproject.com/2007/09/10/nara-looking-for-public-input/#comment-6088</guid>
		<description>[...] that any partnerships (if necessary) are started with a good sense of benefits of risks; see also NARA&#8217;s plan, and the GAO&#8217;s current headache.)  Office of the General [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that any partnerships (if necessary) are started with a good sense of benefits of risks; see also NARA&#8217;s plan, and the GAO&#8217;s current headache.)  Office of the General [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bibliographic Control, Agile Government &#124; The Open House Project</title>
		<link>http://www.theopenhouseproject.com/2007/09/10/nara-looking-for-public-input/comment-page-1/#comment-2869</link>
		<dc:creator>Bibliographic Control, Agile Government &#124; The Open House Project</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 21:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theopenhouseproject.com/2007/09/10/nara-looking-for-public-input/#comment-2869</guid>
		<description>[...] For example, when I wrote recently about the National Archives&#8217; public comment period for their partnership plan for digitization, I was most impressed by the public, iterative nature of the projects&#8217; planning. A superior plan will presumably result if the plan is skillfully subjected to multiple periods of public inspection and re-editing. This process&#8217;s constructive aspects are echoed in both the organization of the Open House Project report, and in the legislative process itself. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For example, when I wrote recently about the National Archives&#8217; public comment period for their partnership plan for digitization, I was most impressed by the public, iterative nature of the projects&#8217; planning. A superior plan will presumably result if the plan is skillfully subjected to multiple periods of public inspection and re-editing. This process&#8217;s constructive aspects are echoed in both the organization of the Open House Project report, and in the legislative process itself. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

