<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Speech or Debate Clause II: Staff Confidently Engaging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theopenhouseproject.com/2007/09/22/speech-or-debate-clause-ii-staff-confidently-engaging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theopenhouseproject.com/2007/09/22/speech-or-debate-clause-ii-staff-confidently-engaging/</link>
	<description>Recommendations, Resources, and Reform</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:53:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: House Appropriations Testimony &#124; The Open House Project</title>
		<link>http://www.theopenhouseproject.com/2007/09/22/speech-or-debate-clause-ii-staff-confidently-engaging/comment-page-1/#comment-6090</link>
		<dc:creator>House Appropriations Testimony &#124; The Open House Project</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 23:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theopenhouseproject.com/2007/09/22/speech-or-debate-clause-ii-staff-confidently-engaging/#comment-6090</guid>
		<description>[...] subpoenas, etc), evaluating privileges (including the legislative branch&#8217;s immunity under the Speech or Debate Clause ), the confidentiality of constituent information, internal House policy development, and advice on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] subpoenas, etc), evaluating privileges (including the legislative branch&#8217;s immunity under the Speech or Debate Clause ), the confidentiality of constituent information, internal House policy development, and advice on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unbelievable: Texas House, Quit Snitching &#124; The Open House Project</title>
		<link>http://www.theopenhouseproject.com/2007/09/22/speech-or-debate-clause-ii-staff-confidently-engaging/comment-page-1/#comment-1110</link>
		<dc:creator>Unbelievable: Texas House, Quit Snitching &#124; The Open House Project</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 20:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theopenhouseproject.com/2007/09/22/speech-or-debate-clause-ii-staff-confidently-engaging/#comment-1110</guid>
		<description>[...] What enforcement mechanism might root out corruption when the incentive to self-police is so nakedly impotent? That&#8217;s a difficult question, since the independence of the legislative branch is a necessary precondition for objective decision-making. (See the speech or debate clause.) You&#8217;d think that electoral pressure would encourage at least the appearance of oversight. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What enforcement mechanism might root out corruption when the incentive to self-police is so nakedly impotent? That&#8217;s a difficult question, since the independence of the legislative branch is a necessary precondition for objective decision-making. (See the speech or debate clause.) You&#8217;d think that electoral pressure would encourage at least the appearance of oversight. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

