Here’s a video of our panel; the other panels are accessible here.

The main thing I took away from the event is that the tension between centralized and decentralized computing will force us to rethink all aspects of digital culture. Privacy means something entirely different when data all goes through centralized servers, the open source movement is fundamentally affected when software becomes web-based (and therefore not even installed on individuals’ computers), security concerns change along with architectural developments, and new relationships between institutions breed new power struggles, new regulatory contexts, and new opportunities for organization.

While this strikes me as a great development, since increasing access to public information should only increase its usefullness and impact, this also raises questions to me.

It strikes me that this kind of cloud computing (which I learned about at Princeton’s CITP Cloud Computing event) will start to affect the way we think about what is a public utility. New kinds of relationships will exist between established institutions and new “cloud” service providers, which come with new opportunities for gain, abuse, conflict of interest, unseen liabilities, etc.

For example, I expect that Google will be able to see all sorts of interesting metadata about who links to specific Hubble images, or who queries scientific databases, or how. The question, then, is whether that sort of information will be publicly available (or even if it could be). If not, then Google’s benevolence starts to look a lot more like self interest, where they gain not only by becoming the arbiter of the public’s access to their information stores, but also by gaining a privileged view of how we relate to our public data.

This isn’t an isolated academic question, either. The way research data are cited and linked is itself the subject of scientific inquiry, will certainly continue to be invaluable.

Perhaps this is gift-horse-mouth looking, and we should be glad that someone wants to provide a free accessible home to public data. A little cynicism however, seems in order, and we might have to rethink what it means to provide a free public service.